Monetizing Your Music

Imagine a platform where 99% of participants compete, often unnoticed, for only 10% of the rewards, while a privileged 1% commands attention. This striking disparity is evident on streaming platforms; in 2020, the top 1% of artists accounted for over 90% of all streams.[1] Such a landscape presents substantial challenges for independent artists as they strive for exposure and revenue amid algorithm-driven recommendations and curated playlists. 

Streaming services like Spotify, Apple Music, and Tidal have transformed music consumption and monetization, offering access to vast libraries but also creating significant barriers, particularly for self-releasing artists and non-major labels. As of 2023, independent entities hold a 46.7% market share on an ownership basis, signaling their growing influence. Projections suggest the global market for independent artists and performing arts companies will expand from $161.6 billion in 2024 to an estimated $428.5 billion by 2030. [2][3] This growth underscores the potential for diverse artistic expressions and highlights the need for innovative strategies to navigate the evolving landscape.

Traditional revenue models are being disrupted, intensifying the earnings gap between mainstream and independent musicians. To counter these challenges, independent artists can adopt multifaceted monetization strategies, including direct sales, merchandise, crowdfunding, and partnerships with niche platforms that prioritize fair revenue distribution. Understanding these dynamics is essential for harnessing the opportunities that streaming presents while ensuring artistic viability in a rapidly changing music scene.

Streaming platforms operate on subscription and advertising models, distributing revenue based on the number of streams. While top artists reap significant rewards, independent musicians receive minimal per-stream payments, indicating a preference for mainstream hits and undermining the potential for niche diversity. This reality contradicts Anderson’s (2006) long tail theory, which holds that streaming can support smaller audiences. [4][5] Therefore, independent artists must leverage social media for fan engagement, sell music directly through platforms like Bandcamp, and explore innovative funding solutions to build sustainable revenue streams and forge deeper connections with their audiences.

Streaming Platforms: Navigating the Pros and Cons

Streaming services like Spotify, Apple Music, and Tidal have revolutionized music consumption. This phenomenon has been extensively examined in cultural and media research that explores the intersection of technology and music. A concise timeline, from the development of physical formats like vinyl records and cassettes in the late 20th century to the dominance of streaming platforms by 2024, highlights significant shifts in how music has been consumed and distributed. Early research on these formats, including CDs, revealed their transformative effects on the music industry and listening behaviors. The rise of digital downloads in the early 2000s highlighted the recording industry's financial decline, alongside the growth of online sharing and piracy.[6] These shifts ultimately set the stage for the streaming era, defined by extensive distribution and algorithmic management. [7][8][9][10] The transformation of music consumption brought about by streaming services illustrates a profound shift in both the industry and listener behaviors, moving from ownership to access. This evolution reflects the cumulative impact of earlier technologies, which disrupted traditional distribution and consumption models. Ultimately, streaming represents a response to these historical changes, underscoring the significant interplay between technological advancement and cultural consumption in the music landscape.

Streaming platforms typically use subscription and advertising models, with revenue distributed based on the number of streams. Research indicates that while top artists benefit from streaming, independent musicians receive minimal per-stream payments. This disparity suggests a preference for mainstream hits over niche diversity, despite Anderson’s (2006) long tail theory, which posits that streaming can support smaller communities. [11][12] Evidence suggests that while streaming platforms generate substantial revenue, the resulting payment structure disproportionately favors mainstream artists, leaving independent musicians with minimal financial rewards. This inequitable distribution underscores a preference for popular hits, contradicting the potential of streaming to foster niche diversity, as theorized by Anderson. Consequently, the practices of these platforms may undermine their ability to support a varied artistic community, ultimately contradicting the envisioned benefits of their business models. Independent artists can adopt multifaceted monetization strategies that include direct sales of music through platforms like Bandcamp, offering exclusive content and merchandise via crowdfunding platforms, leveraging social media for fan engagement, and exploring partnerships with niche streaming services that prioritize equitable revenue distribution to counteract the limitations imposed by mainstream streaming services.

Furthermore, streaming services function as cultural gatekeepers by organizing and controlling the presentation of music, rather than serving as neutral distributors. Nieborg and Poell (2018) describe platformization as a process in which platforms not only deliver content but also shape it, creating a reliance on algorithms that determine user exposure through personalized recommendations and curated playlists.[13] This reliance can significantly impact an artist's success, as noted by Ericksson et al. (2019), with Seaver (2019) highlighting this dependence as a potential trap for artists seeking visibility.[14][15] The evidence provided underscores the role of streaming services as cultural gatekeepers, illustrating how platformization extends beyond mere content delivery to shape user experiences and exposure actively. The reliance on algorithms for personalized recommendations and curated playlists facilitates a controlled presentation of music, ultimately influencing an artist's visibility and success. This dependence creates a framework in which artists may struggle to navigate the digital landscape, reinforcing the idea that streaming platforms play a significant role in determining which music reaches audiences rather than acting as neutral conduits. If tomorrow's playlist shifts, how resilient is an artist’s relationship with their audience? To effectively monetize their music amid streaming services' gatekeeping, independent artists should diversify their revenue streams by leveraging direct-to-fan sales, merchandise, live performances, and exclusive content on subscription platforms, thereby reducing reliance on algorithm-driven visibility and fostering a direct connection with their audience.

The advent of streaming services has fundamentally transformed how listeners engage with and discover new music, shifting reliance away from traditional avenues such as radio and word of mouth toward algorithmic recommendations and curated playlists. The relationship between listener data and music production creates feedback loops that significantly influence artist behavior and song recommendations. Evidence suggests that high skip rates and completion rates prompt artists to adapt by shortening intros and integrating hooks earlier.[16] What does this deluge of metrics mean for an artist’s next single? The implications are clear: artists must consider these dynamics when creating new music. At the same time, streaming platforms offer new opportunities for creative expression, facilitating the growth of niche genres such as K-pop and Lo-Fi Hip Hop through global audience connectivity.[17] However, independent artists report varied experiences; while some appreciate the tools and fan engagement provided by these platforms, others express concerns about the pressure to conform to playlist and algorithmic standards[18][19] Ultimately, listener data acts as a powerful determinant in music design, contributing to more formulaic production practices characterized by shorter tracks and repetitive elements, as highlighted by Morris (2020) and reported by Billboard (2022).[20][21] The evidence presented underscores the transformative impact of streaming services on music engagement and production, illustrating how listener data reshapes artist behavior and music creation. While these platforms provide artists with a vast reach, they also pressure them to conform to algorithmic preferences, potentially leading to homogenized music characterized by formulaic production. To navigate this landscape successfully, independent artists must enhance their visibility through strategic playlist curation, influencer collaborations, and proactive social media marketing while committing to regularly releasing content to sustain listener interest and optimize streaming performance. To effectively monetize their music in a streaming-dominated landscape, independent artists should adopt a multi-faceted strategy that combines targeted social media marketing, direct fan engagement through platforms like Patreon, exclusive merchandise offerings, and partnerships with aligned brands. They should also address the limitations of algorithm-driven visibility by leveraging social media for organic engagement, collaborating with influencers to expand their audience, curating playlists to feature their music alongside compatible artists, and maintaining a consistent release schedule to foster continuous listener interaction and enhance their overall monetization potential.

Maximizing Revenue: Direct Sales and Merchandising Strategies

Despite the prevalence of streaming services, many fans still value owning their music. The research underscores that, amid the dominance of ephemeral streaming, consumers derive value from interactions with physical artifacts, fostering nostalgia and a tangible connection to music.[22] Notably, while streaming services attempt to cultivate "psychological ownership" through personalized playlists, this practice often intensifies rather than diminishes the demand for tangible ownership, particularly among dedicated fans who seek meaningful, lasting non-algorithmic connections to their music.[23][24][25][26] Furthermore, despite the growth of streaming revenue, the resurgence of physical media is evident, with a reported 13.4% increase in physical music revenues in 2023.[27] The scholarly support highlights the critical relationship between physical music ownership and emotional engagement, reinforcing the notion that many fans continue to prioritize tangible connections to their music despite the prevalence of streaming services. The evidence suggests that the physicality of music serves as a conduit for nostalgia and a deeper interaction, fostering a sense of belonging that ephemeral streaming cannot replicate. Imagine the sensory or nostalgic pleasure of holding vinyl and experiencing it as a meaningful engagement that fans can't replicate through streaming—a process that enriches the music experience beyond the digital realm.  Furthermore, the notable increase in physical music revenues is a compelling indicator that dedicated fans are not only resistant to the dominance of digital platforms but are also actively seeking to reaffirm their commitment to music through ownership, thereby validating their attachments in an increasingly digital age. Independent artists can effectively monetize their music by leveraging digital downloads on platforms, creating bespoke merchandise such as T-shirts and vinyl records to enhance their brand identity, and fostering a deep connection with their audience through nostalgia and curated experiences, thereby countering the ephemeral nature of streaming services and affirming the value of tangible ownership in an increasingly digital landscape.

Leveraging Crowdfunding and Fostering Fan Engagement

Platforms such as Patreon and Kickstarter have fundamentally transformed how musicians fund their projects by enabling direct-to-fan, subscription-based, and reward-based models, shifting artists towards entrepreneurial roles. These platforms, which rose between 2021 and 2026, help musicians bypass traditional gatekeepers, build intimate fan relationships, and gain financial independence.[28][29[30] The evidence highlights a significant evolution in music funding through these platforms, which empower artists to take control of their financial futures. However, this shift also places the burden of business operations squarely on artists, who often lack the resources or expertise to manage them effectively. Music Grant Inc. offers an innovative funding solution that alleviates this stress, allowing artists to focus on their creative processes while the organization handles the business intricacies, thus bridging the gap between entrepreneurial demands and artistic creation. 

Artists utilizing platforms like Patreon and Kickstarter can adopt several effective strategies to enhance their funding efforts while maintaining independence. First, they should prioritize their creative output by dedicating time and energy to producing high-quality music without getting overwhelmed by business operations. Maximizing the potential of these crowdfunding platforms is essential; this includes promoting projects effectively, establishing clear goals, and creating compelling rewards that resonate with their audience. Additionally, building strong relationships with fans through direct engagement strategies—such as providing exclusive content and personalized interactions—can cultivate loyalty and encourage consistent financial support. It’s also important for artists to develop essential business skills or seek resources that help them manage budgeting, marketing, and promotion effectively. Finally, leveraging social media platforms to share their journey, interact with fans, and promote their campaigns can significantly enhance visibility and help attract new supporters. By implementing these strategies, artists can successfully navigate the evolving landscape of music funding while focusing on their creative pursuits.

Partnering with Music Grant Inc. focuses on maximizing creative output without the burdens of business management. First, artists should prioritize their time and energy on producing high-quality music rather than getting entangled in the complexities of running a crowdfunding campaign. By choosing to work with Music Grant Inc., they can access tailored funding opportunities, grants, and resources specifically designed to support their artistic projects, allowing them to maintain financial stability without compromising their creative vision. Additionally, while crowd engagement is valuable, Music Grant Inc. offers a more streamlined approach to cultivating deep connections with its audience through professional support and promotional strategies that enhance visibility. Finally, by partnering with Music Grant Inc., artists can delegate all administrative and promotional responsibilities, ensuring their projects are well-managed and allowing them to concentrate fully on their music creation. This comprehensive approach positions Music Grant Inc. as a more effective alternative to the intricacies of crowdfunding platforms, enabling artists to focus on their craft with greater peace of mind.

Exploring Innovative Funding Solutions with Music Grant Inc.

Music Grant Inc. is recognized as "The Bridge," serving as a vital link to music grants and embodying a novel framework that addresses the unique challenges independent artists face in the music industry. This innovative approach is anchored in the grassroots Music Grant Theory and the Music Grant Business Model, both of which emphasize a timeless and borderless framework that evolves alongside the industry.[30] By adapting to the changing landscape, Music Grant Inc. effectively addresses the challenges posed by technological disruptions in both music consumption and creation. As the music industry undergoes transformations approximately every decade, Music Grant Inc. provides a sustainable solution that not only meets the needs of independent artists but also aligns with broader global challenges (T. Mobley, personal communication, September 9, 2020). We act as the fast-track bridge between an independent artist's vision and the capital needed to realize it, setting us apart from traditional grants or labels. The flexibility and adaptability of the music grant business model empower the music industry and artists to navigate these disruptions, ensuring that creativity and innovation continue to thrive regardless of shifting technological trends (T. Mobley, personal communication, September 11, 2018). Despite an unpredictable economic environment, the market is expected to demonstrate resilience, with revenue projected to nearly double between 2024 and 2035.[31] Sheridan and Laszcyk (2025) indicate that the driving forces in this period will differ markedly from those observed in the last five to ten years.[32] Emerging streaming markets, innovative monetization models for music and video content, and superfans' engagement present substantial opportunities for revenue growth within the industry.[33] The provided scholarly support substantiates Music Grant Inc.’s role as an essential bridge for independent artists by illustrating its foundation in the Music Grant Theory and Business Model, which prioritize adaptability within the ever-evolving music industry. This adaptability not only addresses contemporary challenges posed by technological advancements but also secures a pathway for sustainable creative expression that aligns with broader market dynamics. Furthermore, the industry's anticipated resilience amid changing economic factors underscores Music Grant Inc.’s imperative role in facilitating growth and innovation among independent artists, underscoring its significance as “The Bridge.” Independent artists can monetize their music effectively by collaborating with Music Grant Inc. through innovative funding models such as Music Grant DeFi Smart Economy, tokenization of music assets, Music Grant Stock Offerings, and flexible contracts under the Music Grant 180 Deal, while also gaining access to strategic partnerships, comprehensive music services, and resources that promote sustainable growth and artistic independence in the evolving music landscape.[34]

Generating Income through Live Performances and Events

Live performances constitute a critical and substantial source of income for independent artists. Studies show that, despite increased revenue from streaming, musicians face significant challenges earning a considerable income from this source, leading live music to account for 31% to 47% of a musician’s total earnings.[35] Furthermore, independent artists predominantly depend on alternative revenue streams such as live performances and merchandise sales, which serve as crucial income drivers compared to the limited financial returns from streaming, thereby emphasizing the essential role of live performance in the contemporary music industry[36][37[38][39] To illustrate, two mid-size gigs can equal the income generated from approximately 200,000 streams, making live shows an economically savvy choice for musicians aiming to boost their revenue. The analysis reveals that live performances are not merely supplementary income for independent artists but are fundamentally essential to their financial survival and growth. The disparity between earnings from live engagements versus streaming highlights a structural issue within the music industry, suggesting that independent artists must strategically prioritize live shows to maintain economic viability. This reliance on live performance underscores a broader industry trend in which traditional revenue streams are re-emerging as indispensable for sustaining creative careers, challenging the assumption that digital platforms alone can financially support artists. To effectively monetize their music, independent artists should integrate live performances, virtual concerts, and educational workshops into their revenue-generating strategies, thereby enhancing financial sustainability and expanding audience reach. Given the assertion that live performances are a critical and substantial source of income for independent artists, it is evident that strategically incorporating both virtual and in-person engagements can significantly bolster an artist's financial resilience and overall market presence.

Unlocking Earnings: Licensing and Sync Opportunities

The licensing of music for commercials, films, and television programs represents a significant revenue opportunity for independent artists. The year 2026 presents a prime opportunity for independent, non-major artists to engage with the sync market, driven by heightened demand for authentic music across various media, including Netflix and advertising, while access to licensing opportunities for these artists has reached unprecedented levels.[40] Furthermore, projections indicate that sync licensing will emerge as the dominant revenue source in the global music licensing services market by 2025, valued at USD 3.8 billion, as the rise of streaming platforms such as Netflix and YouTube amplifies the need for "pre-cleared music."[41] This trend aligns with findings that a single sync placement can yield significantly higher revenues than streaming, with substantial payouts for independent artists and a growing sector, as confirmed by the Independent Music Publishers International Forum.[42] For example, consider the success story of an indie band that landed a $20,000 placement in a Netflix original, boosting their income and significantly increasing their exposure to a global audience. This kind of success story highlights the transformative opportunities for independent artists in the sync market, as growing demand for authentic music across various media creates favorable conditions for generating revenue. The confluence of increased access to licensing opportunities and the projected dominance of sync licensing as a revenue source indicates a substantial shift that benefits non-major artists. Moreover, the significant financial advantages of sync placements over traditional streaming demonstrate the potential for independent creators to achieve greater economic stability and success in today’s evolving music landscape. To effectively monetize their music, independent artists should actively seek placement opportunities on popular television shows and commercials, engage specialized licensing agencies, and cultivate relationships with music supervisors to better align their creations with industry demands.

Harnessing Social Media and Online Platforms for Success

In the modern digital marketplace, social media is essential for monetizing music. A study of 255 independent artists revealed a significant correlation between social media followings and streaming royalties, indicating that platforms such as TikTok are instrumental in driving both discovery and revenue.[43][44][45] Current engagement metrics, such as “comments-per-post,” provide deeper insight into community health than mere follower counts, underscoring the significance of authentic fan interaction. Given that platforms like TikTok significantly enhance consumer engagement and spending, it is imperative that independent artists strategically use social media. By concentrating on targeted advertising and compelling content on platforms including Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, artists can substantially increase their reach and financial success.

Conclusion: Essential Takeaways for Independent Artists

In conclusion, the music industry is continually evolving, and independent artists must embrace adaptability and innovation to monetize their revenue streams effectively. By exploring diverse strategies such as direct sales, merchandising, and crowdfunding, independent artists can thrive in the technology-driven landscape while cultivating lasting connections with their audiences.

Navigating this dynamic landscape requires a commitment to pivoting and experimenting with new ideas. The bridge between traditional music revenue models and a new paradigm lies in leveraging technology and engaging with communities to create sustainable income streams. Artists are encouraged to engage with Music Grant for our specialized music services and innovative funding solutions, meticulously tailored to support their unique journeys. Our approach is grounded in the Music Grant Theory and a comprehensive business model that prioritizes the specific needs and aspirations of each artist.

Independent artists are encouraged to proactively manage their careers by harnessing creativity and the power of community to unlock new opportunities. It is essential that their music is heard and their stories are shared. Together, progress can be achieved in this evolving industry.

Engagement Discussion:

How do you plan to push the boundaries of monetization in your music career next month? Consider this a collaborative initiative—let's explore uncharted territories together and share our experiments for mutual growth.

Biographical Sketch:

Darwin Jerome Mobley, Jr., is the founder and CEO of Music Grant Inc., a multinational company committed to supporting independent artists. As the creator of the Music Grant Theory and Business Model, Mobley has laid the foundation for a new paradigm in the music industry that empowers independent artists to thrive and innovate. Mobley's firsthand experience in navigating the challenges faced by independent artists makes him a relatable figure to those in the creative industry.

Edited by: Dr. Tyanne D. Mobley and Grace C.

Article Theme(s)

Independent Artists, Streaming Services, Monetization, Revenue Streams, Revenue Disparity, Cultural Gatekeeping, Algorithm, Niche Markets, Crowdfunding, Artist Visibility, Equitable Distribution

GPC Competency 

Competency 3. Strategies for effective program and project design (1, 2, 10, 13);  4. Crafting, constructing, and submitting an effective grant application (1, 2, 8); 6. Methods that cultivate and maintain relationships between fund-seeking organizations and funders, (2)

Music Grant Theory and Music Grant Business Model Alignment:

“A New Paradigm for Societal Recovery and Transformation.”

1. Cultural Identity Development, 2. Connecting to Community, 3. Creating Emotional Connections, 4. Employment Generation through the Arts, 5. Cultural Sector’s Contribution to GDP, 6. Leveraging Digital Platforms for Visibility, 7. Transparency and Security in Transactions, 8. Innovation and Collaboration Across Industries, 9. Cross-Sector Collaborations, 10. Adaptation and Evolution, 11. Investment Opportunities, 12. Stock Offering and Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

8. (Decent Work and Economic Growth), 9. (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), 10. (Reduced Inequalities), 11. (Sustainable Cities and Communities), 12. (Responsible Consumption and Production), 17. (Partnerships for the Goals).

Sources

1. Blake, E. (2020, September 09).  Data shows 90 percent of streams go to the top 1 percent of artists, Rolling Stone. https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/news/top-1-percent-streaming-1055005/

2. Global Industry Analysts, Inc. (2025, October 01). Independent Artists and Performing Arts Companies. [Market Report]. Global Industry Analysts.

3. Mulligan, M. (2024, October 31). State of the independent music economy: Fragmentation and consolidation. MIDiA. https://www.midiaresearch.com/blog/state-of-the-independent-music-economy-fragmentation-and-consolidation

4. Anderson, C. (2006). The long tails: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Hyperion.

5. Datta, H., Knox, G., & Bronnenber, B. J. (2018). Changing their tune: How consumers’ adoption of online streaming affects music consumption and discovery. Marketing Science, 37(1), 5-21. https://doi.otg/10.1287/mksc.2017.1051

6. Khodarahmi, B. (2025). Exploring the music market in the time of streaming and how it affects artistic creativity. Independent Music Researcher, Composer, and Arranger.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17183802

7. Khodarahmi, B. (2025). Exploring the music market in the time of streaming and how it affects artistic creativity. Independent Music Researcher, Composer, and Arranger.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17183802

8. Tschmuck, P. (2012). Creativity and innovation in the music industry. (2nd ed.). Springer.

9. Leyshon, A. (2009). The software slump. Digital music, the democatisation of technology, and the decline of the recording studio sector. Environment and Planning A., 41(6), 1309-1331. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40352

10. Jones, S. (2002). Music that moves: Popular music distribution and network technologies. Cultural Studies, 16(2), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380110107535

11. Datta, H., Knox, G., & Bronnenber, B. J. (2018). Changing their tune: How consumers’ adoption of online streaming affects music consumption and discovery. Marketing Science, 37(1), 5-21. https://doi.otg/10.1287/mksc.2017.1051

12. Anderson, C. (2006). The long tails: Why the future of business is selling less of more. [eBook edition]. Hyperion.

13. Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformisation of cultural production: Theorising the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275-4292. https://doi.org/10.11771461444818769694

14. Eriksson, M., Fleischer, R., Johansson, A., Snickars, P., & Vonderau, P. (2019). Spotify teardown: Inside the black box of streaming music. MIT Press.

15. Seaver, N. (2019) Captivating algorithms: Recommender systems as traps. Journal of Material Culture, 24(4), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183518820366

16. Montecchio, N., Roy, P., & Pauchet, F. (2019). The skipping behaviour of users of music streaming services and its impact on music consumption. arXiv preprint. https://axiv.org/abs/1903.06008

17. Burkart, P. (2014). Music in the cloud and the digital sublime. Popular Music & Society, 37(4), 393-407. http://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2013.810853

18. Frenneaux, R. (2023). The rise of independent artists and the paradox of democratisation in the digital age: Challenges faced by music artists in the new music industry. DIY, Alternative Cultures & Society, 1(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538702231174200

19. Baym, N. K. & Burnett, R. (2009). Amateur experts: International fan labour in Swedish independent music. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(5), 433-449. https://doi.org/101177/1367877909337857

20. Morris, J. W. (2020). Music platforms and the optimization of culture. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 1-12. https://doi.otg/10.1177/2056305120940691

21. Billboard. (2022, November 10). Songs are getting shorter: Streaming and TikTok are reshaping track length. Billboard [Industry Report].  https://www.billboard.com/pro/songs-getting-shorter-tiktok-streaming/

22. Whitehouse, S. (2023). Taking a chance on a record: Lost vinyl consumption practices, in the age of music streaming. Consumption Market & Culture, 26(1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10/1080/10253866.2022.2134124

23. 25. Soto-Angulo, C. (2025, October 15). Lost in the stream: The case of physical media.The Loyola Phoenix. https://loyolaphoenix.com/2025/10/lost-in-the-stream-the-case-for-physical-media/#:~:text=In%20the%20height%20of%20endless,a%20thing%20of%20the%20past.

24. Davies, C., Page, B., Driesener, C., Anesbury, Z., Yang, S., & Bruwer, J. (2022). The power of nostalgia: Age and preference for popular music. Springer, 33(4), 681-692. https:// 10.1007/s11002-022-09626-7

25. Soto-Angulo, C. (2025, October 15). Lost in the stream: The case of physical media.The Loyola Phoenix. https://loyolaphoenix.com/2025/10/lost-in-the-stream-the-case-for-physical-media/#:~:text=In%20the%20height%20of%20endless,a%20thing%20of%20the%20past.

26. Sinclair, G., & Tinson, J. (2017). Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption. Journal of Business Research, 71(1).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j/jbusres.2016.10.002

27. Sae-tae, K., & Wang, Q. (2024). Satisfied but no payment: The impact of perceived value on continuance intention and purchase intention in music streaming services. Telematics and Infornatics Reports, 16, 100179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100179

28. Oliver-Alfonso, M.D.,  Borrego-Domínguez, C., & Sancho-Navarro, J. (2025). Determinants of musicians’ use of reward-based crowdfunding platforms. Emerald Publishing Limited, 38(4), 561-581. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-12-2024-0276

29. Welsted, V. (2024, August 1). Subscription platforms proving vital for musicians struggling with streaming and copyright theft. University of Sussex. https://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/65137#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAmid%20the%20challenges%20of%20music,and%20stronger%20relationships%20with%20patrons.

30. Geurtsm A., & Cepa, K. (2023). Transforming the music industry: How platformization drives business ecosystem envelopment. Long Range Planning, 56(4), 102327, https://doi.org.10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102327

31. Goldman Sachs. (2025, April 2025). Global music revenues are forecasted to double to 200 billion in 2035. https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/global-music-revenues-are-forecast-to-double-to-200-million-in-2035

32. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (2022). Goldman Sachs: Music in the air. https://www.scribd.com/document/694546741/Goldman-Sachs-Music-in-the-Air

33. Goldman Sachs. (2025, April 2025). Global music revenues are forecasted to double to 200 billion in 2035. https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/global-music-revenues-are-forecast-to-double-to-200-million-in-2035

34. Music Grant Inc. About Us. https://musicgrant.com/about-music-grant-inc

35. Everts, R. (2022). Making it big in live music: A multilevel analysis of careers in live music. Cultural Trends, 33(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2023.2255849

36. Dilshod Ugli, M. M., Gautama, B. P., & Sari, M. (2025). The economics of streaming: Financial challenges and opportunities for independent musicians. Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity, 42, 265-286. Retrieved January 21, 2026, from https://sjii.es/index.php/journal/article/view/561

37. Gonzalez, L. F. M. (2025). Independent artists: How do they feature Spotify and other revenue streams within their business model in 2024? [Doctoral dissertation, Budapest University of Economics and Business]. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10/12140/RG.2.2.26946.90569

38. Government of Canada. (2021, June). Study of the economic impacts of music streaming on the Canadian music industry. https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/corporate/transparency/open-government/economic-impact-music-streaming.html

39. Zhang, Q., & Negus, K. (2021). Stages, platforms, streams: The economies and industries of live music after digitization. Popular Music and Society, 44(5), 539-557. https://doi.org/10/1080/03007766.2021.1921909

40. Davison, A., (2026, January 7). Why 2026 is the best year yet for independent artists in sync. Medium. https://medium.com/@htlympremium/why-2026-is-the-best-year-yet-for-independent-artists-in-sync-ab5e07e449a4

41. Morgan, A. (2025). Music licensing services market size (Report No. RI151PUB). Deep Market Insights.

42. Independent Music Publishers International Forum. (2025). IMPF: Global market for independent music publishing. (5th ed.). https://www.impforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMPF-Global-Market-View-Independent-Music-Publishing-April_2025.pdf

43. Winkler, D., Hotz-Behofsits, C., Nils Wölmert, N.,  Papies, D., & Liaukonyt˙e, J. (2026). The impact of social media on music demand: Evidence from quasi-natural experiments (arXiv.2405.14999v2). SSRN Library / Cornell SC Johnson College of Business. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.14999

44. Lee, Z. (2025). The evolution of music in digital media: From viral videos to streaming platforms.  American Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 9(5), 239-256.

45. Watson, A., Watson, J. B., & Tompkins, L. (2022). Does social media pay for music artists? Quantitative evidence on the co-evolution of social media, streaming, and live music. Journal of Cultural Economy, 16(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2022.2087720

46. Grant Professionals Certificate Institute. (2025). Competencies and skills. https://www.grantcredential.org/wp-content/uploads/GPC-Competencies-and-Skills.pdf

47. Mobley, D. J., Jr. (2025). Music grant theory and associated business model. [Paper Presentation]. Music Grant Inc. https://musicgrant.com/music-grant-theory-and-music-grant-business-model

48. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development. (n.d.). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda